Design of New Materials Based on Functionalization of Cu-BTC for Adsorption and Separation of CH4 and CO2: GCMC and MD Simulations Study
Hassan Hashemzadeh, Heidar Raissi, Farzaneh Farzad
Российский журнал физической химии А
https://doi.org/10.1134/S0036024420070134
Metal-organic framework (MOF) is a strong candidate for gas storage and gas separation, which can be modified by various functional groups. In this study, we performed Grand Canonical Monte Carlo (GCMC) and molecular dynamics (MD) simulations to investigate the effect of F, Cl, Br, CHO, NO2, ethyl (Et), methyl (Me), and SH functional groups on the methane and carbon dioxide adsorption and CH4/CO2 separation properties in copper benzene-1,3,5-tricarboxylate (Cu-BTC). Adsorption isotherm of CO2 and CH4 indicate that Cu-BTC has a slight adsorption preference for CO2 over the methane. CH4 adsorption on the NH2, Et, and Me derivatives of Cu-BTC is slightly more than the parent Cu-BTC. Furthermore, our results showed that the MOF selectivity changed with the composition, functional group and pressure. Therefore, we will able choose specific condition for special application. MD results reveal that CO2 molecules more strongly interact with MOF sorption sites than CH4 molecules and also NH2–Cu-BTC system has the highest interaction energy. Furthermore, the mean-square displacement (MSD) results show that the motion of the gas molecules is diffusive and they can move more easily within the pores of Cu-BTC and its derivatives.
- Department of Chemistry, University of Birjand, Birjand, Iran Hassan Hashemzadeh, Heidar Raissi & Farzaneh Farzad
- S. Cavenati, C. A. Grande, and A. E. Rodrigues, J. Chem. Eng. Data 49, 1095 (2004).
- E. L. First, M. M. Hasan, and C. A. Floudas, AIChE J. 60, 1767 (2014).
- F. Gholampour and S. Yeganegi, Chem. Eng. Sci. 117, 426 (2014).
- X. Zhou, W. Huang, J. Miao, Q. Xia, Z. Zhang, H. Wang, and Z. Li, Chem. Eng. J. 266, 339 (2015).
- K. Peikert, F. Hoffmann, and M. Fro, Chem. Commun. 3, 11196 (2012). doi 10. 1039/c2cc36220a
- R. B. Getman, Y.-S. Bae, C. E. Wilmer, and R. Q. Snurr, Chem. Rev. 112, 703 (2011).
- S. Couck, J. F. M. Denayer, G. V Baron, T. Rémy, J. Gascon, and F. Kapteijn, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 131, 6326 (2009).
- M. Zaboli and H. Raissi, Mol. Simul. 43, 675 (2017).
- M. Shahabi and H. Raissi, J. Incl. Phenom. Macrocycl. Chem. (n.d.). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10847-016-0664-6
- J. J. Gutiérrez-Sevillano, A. Caro-Pérez, D. Dubbeldam, and S. Calero, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 13, 20453 (2011).
- M. H. Kowsari and S. Naderlou, Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 240, 39 (2017).
- J. Zhang, M. B. Clennell, K. Liu, D. N. Dewhurst, M. Pervukhina, and N. Sherwood, Fuel 177, 53 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2016.02.075
- S. S.-Y. Chui, S. M.-F. Lo, J. P. H. Charmant, A. G. Orpen, and I. D. Williams, Science (Washington, DC, U.S.) 283, 1148 (1999).
- S. L. Mayo, B. D. Olafson, and W. A. Goddard, J. Phys. Chem. 94, 8897 (1990).
- B. Hess, C. Kutzner, D. van der Spoel, and E. Lindahl, J. Chem. Theory Comput. 4, 435 (2008).
- S. Nosé, Mol. Phys. 52, 255 (1984).
- W. G. Hoover, Phys. Rev. A 31, 1695 (1985).
- W. Humphrey, A. Dalke, and K. Schulten, J. Mol. Graph. 14, 33 (1996).